%PDF-1.3
%%
%%Page: 1 1
4 0 obj
<<
/Length 5 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 664.5 Tm
/F1 13 Tf 100 Tz
88.1395 -8.4 Td
1.3 Tw
0 Tc
(FOR PUBLICATION) Tj
/F1 15 Tf 100 Tz
-78.2395 -24 Td
1.5 Tw
(UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS) Tj
43.47 -16 Td
(FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-53.37 -18 Td
1.2 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
0 0 Td
183.8 0 Td
/F3 20 Tf 100 Tz
-2.18 -17.6 Td
2 Tw
() Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-181.62 -2.8 Td
1.2 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(, dba Internet) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(Truckstop.com,) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
85.668 -13.2 Td
(Plaintiff-Appellee,) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-3.168 -18 Td
(v.) Tj
132.57 0 Td
(No. 02-35856) Tj
-215.07 -18 Td
(G) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( LLC, and/or) Tj
226.734 0 Td
(D.C. No.) Tj
/F3 20 Tf 100 Tz
-45.114 -7.9 Td
2 Tw
() Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-181.62 -5.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(Codified Corporation,) Tj
200.34 0 Td
(CV-00-00476-BLW) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
-129.996 -13.2 Td
(Defendant-Appellant,) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
153.996 -4.8 Td
(OPINION) Tj
-146.004 -13.2 Td
(and) Tj
-78.336 -18 Td
(J) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ACK) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( C. M) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARTIN) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(,) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
121.008 -13.2 Td
(Defendant.) Tj
/F3 20 Tf 100 Tz
60.612 -8.8 Td
1.6 Ts
2 Tw
() Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-142.878 -26.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(Appeal from the United States District Court) Tj
51.87 -13.2 Td
(for the District of Idaho) Tj
-46.95 -13.2 Td
(B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding) Tj
50.808 -26.2 Td
(Argued and Submitted) Tj
-44.76 -13.2 Td
(February 10, 2004Seattle, Washington) Tj
42.828 -26.2 Td
(Filed October 15, 2004) Tj
-74.478 -26.2 Td
(Before: Dorothy) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(W.) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Nelson, Andrew) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(J.) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Kleinfeld, and) Tj
45.504 -13.2 Td
(Raymond) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(C.) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Fisher, Circuit) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Judges.) Tj
17.808 -26.2 Td
(Opinion by Judge Kleinfeld) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 664.5 cm
0 G
.9 w 0 -65.95 m 183.8 -65.95 l s
1.2 w 186.6 -141.5 m 186.6 -73.8 l s
1.2 w 186.6 -226.2 m 186.6 -158.5 l s
.9 w 0 -233.15 m 183.3 -233.15 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
292.25 -664.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14565) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
2631
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F3 8 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 4 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 2 2
12 0 obj
<<
/Length 13 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
120.996 -27.6 Td
1.2 Tw
0 Tc
(COUNSEL) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-120.996 -26.2 Td
1.85 Tw
(John W. Dozier, Jr., Dozier Law Offices, P.C., Glen Allen,) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(Virginia, for the appellant. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -8.15 m 300 -8.15 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14567) Tj
-212.0226 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
13 0 obj
853
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 12 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 3 3
15 0 obj
<<
/Length 16 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.96 Tw
0 Tc
(Steven B. Andersen \(argued\), Holland & Hart, LLP, Boise,) Tj
0 -12.9 Td
1.26 Tw
(Idaho, and Marcy G. Glenn \(briefed\), Holland & Hart, LLP,) Tj
0 -12.9 Td
1.2 Tw
(Denver, Colorado, for the appellee. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
123.666 -43.4 Td
(OPINION) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-123.666 -25.7 Td
(KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: ) Tj
12 -25.8 Td
.41 Tw
(This case requires us to construe damages provisions in the) Tj
-12 -12.9 Td
1.2 Tw
(Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(1) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
1.2 Tw
( ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
136.338 -25.8 Td
(Facts) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-124.338 -25.8 Td
2.16 Tw
(Truck drivers and trucking companies try to avoid dead-) Tj
-12 -12.9 Td
.92 Tw
(heading. ) Tj
(Deadheading) Tj
( means having to drive a truck, ordi-) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.66 Tw
(narily on a return trip, without a revenue-producing load. If) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.55 Tw
(the truck is moving, truck drivers and their companies want) Tj
0 -13 Td
.48 Tw
(it to be carrying revenue-producing freight. In the past, truck-) Tj
0 -13 Td
.1 Tw
(ers and shippers used blackboards to match up trips and loads.) Tj
0 -13 Td
3.67 Tw
(Eventually television screens were used instead of black-) Tj
0 -13 Td
.75 Tw
(boards, but the matching was still inefficient. Better informa-) Tj
0 -13 Td
.64 Tw
(tion on where the trucks and the loads are and quick, easy) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.5 Tw
(access to that information benefits shippers, carriers, and) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.2 Tw
(consumers. ) Tj
12 -25.8 Td
2.38 Tw
(Creative Computing developed a successful Internet site,) Tj
-12 -13 Td
3.14 Tw
(truckstop.com, which it calls ) Tj
(The Internet Truckstop,) Tj
( to) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.5 Tw
(match loads with trucks. The site is very easy to use. It has) Tj
0 -13 Td
.4 Tw
(a feature called ) Tj
(radius search) Tj
( that lets a truck driver in, say,) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.2 Tw
(Middletown, Connecticut, with some space in his truck, find) Tj
0 -13 Td
.75 Tw
(within seconds all available loads in whatever mileage radius) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.07 Tw
(he likes \(and of course lets a shipper post a load so that a) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.09 Tw
(trucker with space can find it\). The site was created so early) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.3 Tw
(in Internet history and worked so well that it came to domi-) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.2 Tw
(nate the load-board industry. ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -25.7 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(1) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
1 Tw
(18 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(1030. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -58.55 m 300 -58.55 l s
.5 w 0 -477.95 m 300 -477.95 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14568) Tj
60.4774 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
3254
endobj
14 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 15 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 4 4
19 0 obj
<<
/Length 20 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -8.4 Td
3.95 Tw
0 Tc
(Getloaded decided to compete, but not honestly. After) Tj
-12 -13 Td
.72 Tw
(Getloaded set up a load-matching site, it wanted to get a big-) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.37 Tw
(ger piece of Creative's market. Creative wanted to prevent) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.7 Tw
(that, so it prohibited access to its site by competing load-) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.38 Tw
(matching services. The Getloaded officers thought trucking) Tj
0 -13 Td
3 Tw
(companies would probably use the same login names and) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.47 Tw
(passwords on truckstop.com as they did on getloaded.com.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1 Tw
(Getloaded's president, Patrick Hull, used the login name and) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.62 Tw
(password of a Getloaded subscriber, in effect impersonating) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.24 Tw
(the trucking company, to sneak into truckstop.com. Getload-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2 Tw
(ed's vice-president, Ken Hammond, accomplished the same) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.36 Tw
(thing by registering a defunct company, RFT Trucking, as a) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.25 Tw
(truckstop.com subscriber. These tricks enabled them to see all) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.5 Tw
(of the information available to Creative's bona fide custom-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(ers. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
3.2 Tw
(Getloaded's officers also hacked into the code Creative) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.88 Tw
(used to operate its website. Microsoft had distributed a patch) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.18 Tw
(to prevent a hack it had discovered, but Creative Computing) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.75 Tw
(had not yet installed the patch on truckstop.com. Getloaded's) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.78 Tw
(president and vice-president hacked into Creative Comput-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.7 Tw
(ing's website through the back door that this patch would) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1 Tw
(have locked. Once in, they examined the source code for the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(tremendously valuable radius-search feature. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
1 Tw
(Getloaded used a more old-fashioned trick to get unautho-) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
1.87 Tw
(rized access to Creative Computing's customer list. It hired) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
6.04 Tw
(away a Creative Computing employee who had given) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.52 Tw
(Getloaded an unauthorized tour of the truckstop.com website.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.38 Tw
(This employee, while still working for Creative, accessed) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.21 Tw
(confidential information regarding several thousand of Cre-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.96 Tw
(ative's customers. He downloaded, and sent to his home e-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
4.33 Tw
(mail account, the confidential address to truckstop.com's) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.2 Tw
(server so that he could access the server from home and) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(retrieve customer lists. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
2.33 Tw
(Creative Computing first discovered what Getloaded had) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
1.47 Tw
(done at a trade show in 1999. Getloaded was demonstrating) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14569) Tj
-212.0226 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
20 0 obj
3424
endobj
18 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 19 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 5 5
22 0 obj
<<
/Length 23 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
.81 Tw
0 Tc
(a program that looked suspiciously like truckstop.com. Years) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.62 Tw
(later, it was clear why. During discovery, Creative uncovered) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.75 Tw
(a handwritten Getloaded employee's to-do list that included) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.14 Tw
(mimic truckstop.com.) Tj
( After the Creative employee who had) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.16 Tw
(been feeding confidential information to Getloaded defected,) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
2.42 Tw
(Creative checked his computer and found evidence that he) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.78 Tw
(improperly accessed customer information before his depar-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.2 Tw
(ture. ) Tj
12 -26.8 Td
2.8 Tw
(Creative Computing sued Getloaded in district court for) Tj
-12 -13.5 Td
2.33 Tw
(copyright infringement, Lanham Act violations, and misap-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.07 Tw
(propriation of trade secrets under the Idaho Trade Secrets Act.) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.78 Tw
(Creative also sought a temporary restraining order. The court) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.28 Tw
(granted a TRO that prohibited Getloaded from, among other) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.52 Tw
(things, removing or destroying evidence of how it had copied) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.42 Tw
(and used truckstop.com's source code, marketed to customers) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
3 Tw
(on Creative's customer list, or accessed the truckstop.com) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.66 Tw
(site. The parties stipulated to continuing the order in substan-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.4 Tw
(tially the same form as a preliminary injunction while the liti-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
4.76 Tw
(gation was pending. Subsequently, Creative amended its) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.28 Tw
(complaint, adding claims for damages under the federal Com-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.2 Tw
(puter Fraud and Abuse Act.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(2) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
1.2 Tw
( ) Tj
12 -26.8 Td
.11 Tw
(The injunction did not work. Getloaded violated it. The dis-) Tj
-12 -13.5 Td
1.52 Tw
(trict court made an express finding that ) Tj
(Getloaded acted in) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
2.13 Tw
(bad faith as its senior management and others under its) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
2.17 Tw
(supervision and with its knowledge lied under oath and) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.14 Tw
(violated the Court's injunction.) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(3) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The district judge carefully) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.41 Tw
(worked his way through contradictions in Patrick Hull's testi-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
2.61 Tw
(mony, matching the testimony with truckstop.com's log of) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.63 Tw
(access to the site and the testimony of others who could have) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.11 Tw
(logged on at the critical times, thereby establishing that Hull) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
2.7 Tw
(had lied under oath. Expert testimony demonstrated to the) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26.5 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(2) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
1 Tw
(18 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(1030. ) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.41 Tw
(3) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Creative Computing v. Getloaded.com) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, No. 00-476-S-BLW, slip op. at) Tj
-10 -11.4 Td
1 Tw
(2 \(D. Idaho Aug. 28, 2002\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -451.75 m 300 -451.75 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14570) Tj
60.4774 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
3796
endobj
21 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 22 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 6 6
25 0 obj
<<
/Length 26 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.75 Tw
0 Tc
(judge that Getloaded had destroyed evidence that showed it) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(had copied source code in violation of the injunction. ) Tj
12 -26.1 Td
2.35 Tw
(The case went to a jury trial. It turned out that none of) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
1.14 Tw
(truckstop.com's code was found in getloaded.com's code, so) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(the jury's special verdict was for the defendant on the copy-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.4 Tw
(right claim. Also, the site looked different enough that the) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(special verdict was in favor of the defendant on the Lanham) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.28 Tw
(Act trade dress claim. But Creative Computing won anyway) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.75 Tw
(because the jury rendered special verdicts that Getloaded had) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.18 Tw
(violated the Idaho Trade Secrets Act and the federal Com-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.92 Tw
(puter Fraud and Abuse Act. Damages awarded were $60,000) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.42 Tw
(for the state law violation and $150,000 for each of three fed-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.53 Tw
(eral law violations, totaling $510,000. Pursuant to the Idaho) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.55 Tw
(Trade Secrets Act, the district court awarded an additional) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.47 Tw
($120,000 in exemplary damages because of Getloaded's will-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.75 Tw
(ful and malicious conduct.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(4) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The court also awarded $300,000) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.58 Tw
(in fees and $42,787.35 in expenses as sanctions to compen-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.22 Tw
(sate Creative Computing for the expense of figuring out and) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.66 Tw
(proving Getloaded's violations of the preliminary injunction) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.96 Tw
(and false statements in depositions.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(5) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The court entered a per-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.21 Tw
(manent injunction extending indefinitely several provisions of) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.22 Tw
(the preliminary injunction, such as the prohibition against) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(Getloaded's accessing truckstop.com. Getloaded appeals. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
128.328 -26.2 Td
(Analysis) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
-128.328 -26.2 Td
(I.) Tj
9 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
12 -26.2 Td
1.44 Tw
(Getloaded argues that no action could lie under the Com-) Tj
-12 -13.2 Td
.7 Tw
(puter Fraud and Abuse Act because it requires a $5,000 floor) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.3 Tw
(for damages from each unauthorized access, and that Creative) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.4 Tw
(Computing submitted no evidence that would enable a jury to) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.35 Tw
(4) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Idaho Code ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.35 Tw
(48-803\(2\) \() Tj
(If willful and malicious misappropria-) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
1.81 Tw
(tion exists, the court may award exemplary damages in an amount not) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1.17 Tw
(exceeding twice any award made under subsection \(1\) of this section.) Tj
(\).) Tj
10 -14 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(5) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
1 Tw
(See ) Tj
(Chambers v. NASCO, Inc.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 501 U.S. 32, 44 \(1991\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -441.35 m 300 -441.35 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14571) Tj
-212.0226 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
3905
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 25 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 7 7
28 0 obj
<<
/Length 29 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
2.33 Tw
0 Tc
(find that the floor was reached on any single unauthorized) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
2.81 Tw
(access. It relies for this argument on several district court) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
-.96 Tw
(cases that required $5,000 damages from ) Tj
(a single act or event) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(6) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -12.2 Td
2.06 Tw
(and on a phrase in the Senate Report on the bill.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(7) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Creative) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
2 Tw
(Computing cites several district court cases going the other) Tj
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -12.2 Td
1.23 Tw
(way,) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(8) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( but neither the parties nor we have found circuit court) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(authority on point. ) Tj
12 -24.4 Td
1.52 Tw
(The briefs dispute which version of the statute we should) Tj
-12 -12.2 Td
2.7 Tw
(apply the one in effect when Getloaded committed the) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.03 Tw
(wrongs, or the one in effect when the case went to trial \(which) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
3.15 Tw
(is still in effect\). The old version of the statute made an) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
1.52 Tw
(exception to the fraudulent access provision if ) Tj
(the value of) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.63 Tw
(such use [unauthorized access to a protected computer] is not) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.57 Tw
(more than $5,000 in any 1-year period.) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(9) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The new version, in) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
1 Tw
(effect now and during trial, says ) Tj
(loss . . . during any 1-year) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
.72 Tw
(period . . . aggregating at least $5,000 in value.) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(10) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( These pro-) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(visions are materially identical. ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -24.1 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.05 Tw
(6) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
(In re Pharmatrak, Inc. Privacy Litigation) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 220 F. Supp. 2d 4 \(D.) Tj
-10 -10.5 Td
.82 Tw
(Mass. 2002\); ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(In re Am. Online, Inc. Version 5.0 Software Litigation) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 168) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
.13 Tw
(F. Supp. 2d 1359 \(S.D. Fla. 2001\); ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Chance v. Avenue A, Inc.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 165 F. Supp.) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
1.53 Tw
(2d 1153 \(W.D. Wash. 2001\); ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(In re Doubleclick Inc. Privacy Litigation) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(,) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
1 Tw
(154 F. Supp. 2d 497 \(S.D.N.Y. 2001\). ) Tj
10 -13.1 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.97 Tw
(7) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(S. Rep. 99-432, at 5 \(1986\), ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted in ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2479,) Tj
-10 -10.5 Td
1.08 Tw
(2483 \() Tj
([T]he Committee intends to make clear that losses caused by the) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
.55 Tw
(same act may be aggregated for purposes of meeting the . . . threshold.) Tj
(\).) Tj
10 -13.1 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.7 Tw
(8) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
(Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts B.V. v. Consorcio Barr) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 267 F.) Tj
-10 -10.5 Td
1.57 Tw
(Supp. 2d 1268 \(S.D. Fla. 2003\); ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Am. Online, Inc. v. Nat'l Health Care) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
.52 Tw
(Discount, Inc.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 174 F. Supp. 2d 890 \(N.D. Iowa 2001\); ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Register.com, Inc.) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
.96 Tw
(v. Verio, Inc.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 126 F. Supp. 2d 238 \(S.D.N.Y. 2000\); ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Am. Online, Inc. v.) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
1 Tw
(LCGM, Inc.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 46 F. Supp. 2d 444 \(E.D. Va. 1998\). ) Tj
10 -13.1 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.8 Tw
(9) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(18 U.S.C. 1030\(a\)\(4\) \(2001\) \() Tj
([Whoever] knowingly and with intent) Tj
-10 -10.5 Td
3.96 Tw
(to defraud, accesses a protected computer without authorization, or) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
2.14 Tw
(exceeds authorized access, and by means of such conduct furthers the) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
.02 Tw
(intended fraud and obtains anything of value, unless the object of the fraud) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
1.34 Tw
(and the thing obtained consists only of the use of the computer and the) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
1 Tw
(value of such use is not more than $5,000 in any 1-year period.) Tj
(\). ) Tj
10 -13.1 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.7 Tw
(10) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(18 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.7 Tw
(1030\(a\)\(5\)\(B\)\(i\) \() Tj
([Whoever caused] loss to 1 or more) Tj
-10 -10.5 Td
1.33 Tw
(persons during any 1-year period \(and, for purposes of an investigation,) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
1.22 Tw
(prosecution, or other proceeding brought by the United States only, loss) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
.92 Tw
(resulting from a related course of conduct affecting 1 or more other pro-) Tj
0 -10.5 Td
1 Tw
(tected computers\) aggregating at least $5,000 in value.) Tj
(\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -226.85 m 300 -226.85 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14572) Tj
60.4774 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
5564
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 28 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 8 8
32 0 obj
<<
/Length 33 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -8.4 Td
2.11 Tw
0 Tc
(The old version of the statute defined ) Tj
(damage) Tj
( as ) Tj
(any) Tj
-12 -13 Td
.77 Tw
(impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program,) Tj
0 -13 Td
-1.27 Tw
(a system, or information) Tj
( that caused the loss of at least $5,000.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(11) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.1 Td
3.77 Tw
(It had no separate definition of ) Tj
(loss.) Tj
( The new version) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.4 Tw
(defines ) Tj
(damage) Tj
( the same way, but adds a definition of loss.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1 Tw
(Loss) Tj
( is defined in the new version as ) Tj
(any reasonable cost) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.8 Tw
(to any victim, including the cost of responding to an offense,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.4 Tw
(conducting a damage assessment, and restoring the data . . .) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.5 Tw
(and any revenue lost, cost incurred, or other consequential) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(damages incurred because of interruption of service.) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(12) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
1.2 Tw
( ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -26 Td
2.1 Tw
([1]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( For purposes of this case, we need not decide which) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
2.87 Tw
(version of the Act applies, because Getloaded loses either) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.53 Tw
(way. Neither version of the statute supports a construction) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.02 Tw
(that would require proof of $5,000 of damage or loss from a) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.11 Tw
(single unauthorized access. The syntax makes it clear that in) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.06 Tw
(both versions, the $5,000 floor applies to how much damage) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.64 Tw
(or loss there is to the victim over a one-year period, not from) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.32 Tw
(a particular intrusion. Getloaded argues that ) Tj
(impairment) Tj
( is) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.71 Tw
(singular, so the floor has to be met by a single intrusion. The) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.57 Tw
(premise does not lead to the conclusion. The statute \(both the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.67 Tw
(earlier and the current versions\) says ) Tj
(damage) Tj
( means ) Tj
(any) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.72 Tw
(impairment to the integrity or availability of data [etc.] . . .) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.41 Tw
(that causes loss aggregating at least $5,000.) Tj
( Multiple intru-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.45 Tw
(sions can cause a single impairment, and multiple corruptions) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.54 Tw
(of data can be described as a single ) Tj
(impairment) Tj
( to the data.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.93 Tw
(The statute does not say that an ) Tj
(impairment) Tj
( has to result) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.24 Tw
(from a single intrusion, or has to be a single corrupted byte.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
-.87 Tw
(A court construing a statute attributes a rational purpose to Con-) Tj
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.1 Td
5.06 Tw
(gress.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(13) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Getloaded's construction would attribute obvious) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.62 Tw
(futility to Congress rather than rationality, because a hacker) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.83 Tw
(could evade the statute by setting up thousands of $4,999 \(or) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.84 Tw
(millions of $4.99\) intrusions. As the First Circuit pointed out) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -25.8 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(11) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
1 Tw
(18 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(1030\(e\)\(8\) \(2001\). ) Tj
0 -13.9 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(12) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
1 Tw
(18 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(1030\(e\)\(11\). ) Tj
0 -13.9 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
2.22 Tw
(13) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Longview Fibre Co. v. Rasmussen) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 980 F.2d 1307, 1311 \(9th Cir.) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(1992\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -438.85 m 300 -438.85 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14573) Tj
-212.0226 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
4421
endobj
31 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 32 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 9 9
35 0 obj
<<
/Length 36 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
.21 Tw
0 Tc
(in the analogous circumstance of physical impairment, so nar-) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
3.52 Tw
(row a construction of the $5,000 impairment requirement) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
.61 Tw
(would merely ) Tj
(reward sophisticated intruders.) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(14) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The damage) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
.6 Tw
(floor in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act contains no ) Tj
(sin-) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
1.2 Tw
(gle act) Tj
( requirement. ) Tj
12 -27 Td
1.52 Tw
(Getloaded's scrap of legislative history is a remark in the) Tj
-12 -13.6 Td
.63 Tw
(Senate Report that ) Tj
(the Committee intends to make clear that) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
.2 Tw
(losses caused by the same act may be aggregated for purposes) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
1.18 Tw
(of meeting the . . . threshold.) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(15) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The obvious purpose of this) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
3.53 Tw
(remark was permissive, to allow aggregation to meet the) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
.93 Tw
($5,000 floor, as when one intrusion causes one expense after) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
2 Tw
(another for months. Getloaded wants us to read the remark) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
1.16 Tw
(restrictively instead of permissively, to mean that the $5,000) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
.97 Tw
(floor has to be reached from a single intrusion. This seems a) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
3.22 Tw
(fine example of an unambiguous statute to which we are) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
1.45 Tw
(asked to apply an ambiguous snippet of legislative history.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(16) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.6 Td
.77 Tw
(It makes no sense to parse the ambiguous legislative history) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.97 Tw
(as though it were the law. The preferable way to resolve lin-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
2.82 Tw
(guistic ambiguity is to evaluate the alternative readings in) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.2 Tw
(light of the purpose of the statute.) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(17) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
1.2 Tw
( ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -27 Td
(II.) Tj
9 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Damages) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -27 Td
2.63 Tw
([2]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Getloaded argues that the district court erred by not) Tj
-12 -13.5 Td
4.85 Tw
(confining damages to economic damages, as the statute) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.91 Tw
(requires. No inappropriate damages were allowed or granted.) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.14 Tw
(Both the old and new versions of the statute limit damages for) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.97 Tw
(loss aggregating at least $5,000 in a year to ) Tj
(economic dam-) Tj
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26.7 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.52 Tw
(14) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(EF Cultural Travel BV v. Explorica, Inc.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 274 F.3d 577, 585 \(1st Cir.) Tj
-10 -11.5 Td
1 Tw
(2001\). ) Tj
10 -14.3 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.63 Tw
(15) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(S. Rep. 99-432, at 5 \(1986\), ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted in ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2479,) Tj
-10 -11.5 Td
1 Tw
(2483. ) Tj
10 -14.3 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
2.24 Tw
(16) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Burns v. Stone Forest Indus., Inc.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 147 F.3d 1182, 1184 \(9th Cir.) Tj
-10 -11.5 Td
1 Tw
(1998\). ) Tj
10 -14.3 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(17) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
1 Tw
(Id.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
( at 1184. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -400.05 m 300 -400.05 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14574) Tj
60.4774 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
4043
endobj
34 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 35 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 10 10
38 0 obj
<<
/Length 39 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
.3 Tw
0 Tc
(ages.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(18) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Getloaded objects to paying damages for loss of busi-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.37 Tw
(ness and business goodwill. The objection is without force) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.1 Tw
(because those are economic damages. The statutory restric-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.38 Tw
(tion, ) Tj
(limited to economic damages,) Tj
( precludes damages for) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.77 Tw
(death, personal injury, mental distress, and the like. When an) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.66 Tw
(individual or firm's money or property are impaired in value,) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
3.02 Tw
(or money or property is lost, or money must be spent to) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.8 Tw
(restore or maintain some aspect of a business affected by a) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.41 Tw
(violation, those are ) Tj
(economic damages.) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(19) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The same result is) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.5 Tw
(compelled under both the old and new versions of the statute.) Tj
12 -26.4 Td
3.78 Tw
(Next, Getloaded argues that many of the expenses for) Tj
-12 -13.3 Td
3.45 Tw
(which Creative Computing claimed damages were routine) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.71 Tw
(computer maintenance and upgrades they would have needed) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.96 Tw
(to do anyway. Getloaded also argues that, had truckstop.com) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
4.04 Tw
(installed Microsoft's free patch that had been distributed) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.63 Tw
(before Getloaded hacked in, the hack would have been pre-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
(vented. Both the old version of the statute and the new one) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.95 Tw
(require that the impairment ) Tj
(causes) Tj
( the $5,000 aggregate) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.37 Tw
(loss in a year.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(20) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Damages are indeed limited to those caused) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.5 Tw
(by the impairment, which may not be the same thing as the) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.7 Tw
(expenses of the victim subsequent to the impairment.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(21) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( While) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.3 Tw
(some of the damages claimed were arguable, there was no) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.81 Tw
(reversible error in what was allowed. Getloaded's argument) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.36 Tw
(that truckstop.com could have prevented some of the harm by) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.73 Tw
(installing the patch is analogous to a thief arguing that ) Tj
(I) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.24 Tw
(would not have been able to steal your television if you had) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.46 Tw
(installed deadbolts instead of that silly lock I could open with) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26.2 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
3.42 Tw
(18) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Compare) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
( 18 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
3.42 Tw
(1030\(g\) \(2004\), ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(with) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
( 18 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
3.42 Tw
(1030\(g\)) Tj
-10 -11.3 Td
1 Tw
(\(2001\). ) Tj
10 -14.1 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.27 Tw
(19) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Cf.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
( Black's Law Dictionary 552 \(8th ed. 2004\) \(including ) Tj
(lost profits) Tj
-10 -11.3 Td
1.29 Tw
(and loss of good will or business reputation) Tj
( in the definition of conse-) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
1 Tw
(quential economic losses\). ) Tj
10 -14.1 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
10.73 Tw
(20) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Compare) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
( 18 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
10.73 Tw
(1030\(a\)\(5\)\(B\)\(i\), ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(with) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
( 18 U.S.C.) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(1030\(e\)\(8\)\(A\) \(2001\). ) Tj
10 -14 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.04 Tw
(21) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(18 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.04 Tw
(1030\(e\)\(8\) \(2001\); ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(United States v. Middleton) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 231 F.3d) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(1207, 1213 \(9th Cir. 2000\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -379.15 m 300 -379.15 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14575) Tj
-212.0226 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
4589
endobj
37 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 38 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 11 11
41 0 obj
<<
/Length 42 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.25 Tw
0 Tc
(a credit card.) Tj
( A causal chain from the thief to the victim is) Tj
0 -13 Td
3.91 Tw
(not broken by a vulnerability that the victim negligently) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(leaves open to the thief. ) Tj
12 -25.9 Td
.75 Tw
(Getloaded argues that the evidence was insufficient for the) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.08 Tw
(jury's award because the form in which Creative Computing's) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.85 Tw
(expert witness presented the damages allowed only for an all) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.88 Tw
(or nothing amount that included damages for the claims on) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.51 Tw
(which Creative Computing lost. But we do not review the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.44 Tw
(expert's testimony, we review the judgment based on the ver-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.58 Tw
(dict. The verdict was not ) Tj
(clearly unsupported by the evi-) Tj
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.1 Td
3.18 Tw
(dence,) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(22) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( so it withstands Getloaded's challenge. The jury) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.22 Tw
(awarded $150,000 on each of the three federal claims plus) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.58 Tw
($60,000 on the state law claim on which Creative Computing) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.22 Tw
(prevailed, not the $740,000 its expert opined. The jury did) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
4.57 Tw
(not, blindly or otherwise, adopt the expert's conclusion.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.51 Tw
(Getloaded's argument also assumes too much, by supposing) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.12 Tw
(that because Creative Computing lost on some claims, its) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.01 Tw
(damages necessarily were less. If an accident breaks a per-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.02 Tw
(son's leg, and he sues on theories of assault and battery, negli-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.95 Tw
(gence, and strict liability, but prevails only on his strict) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.73 Tw
(liability claim, he is still entitled to the full compensatory) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.3 Tw
(damages for his broken leg. Getloaded does not argue that the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.23 Tw
(expert should not have been allowed to testify, nor does it) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.63 Tw
(challenge the jury instructions, and the jury was required to) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.83 Tw
(analyze causation and damages from the wrongs that they) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.47 Tw
(found. The jury was told that it could accept all, part, or none) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.63 Tw
(of the expert witness's testimony, and it had other evidence) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.4 Tw
(aside from that testimony from which it could reach a reason-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(able conclusion about the amount of damages. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -26 Td
(III.) Tj
9 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Sanctions) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
12 -26 Td
.87 Tw
(The district court imposed sanctions of $300,000 for attor-) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
3.28 Tw
(neys' fees plus $42,787.35 for expenses for experts. This) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.33 Tw
(award was to compensate Creative Computing for what it had) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -25.9 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.96 Tw
(22) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 762 F.2d 753, 760 \(9th Cir. 1985\).) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -477.85 m 300 -477.85 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14576) Tj
60.4774 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
3787
endobj
40 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 41 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 12 12
44 0 obj
<<
/Length 45 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1 Tw
0 Tc
(to spend because of Getloaded's dishonesty in discovery and) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
1.37 Tw
(its destruction of evidence. Getloaded does not challenge all) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
.41 Tw
(of this award, but does challenge $19,356.59. The $19,356.59) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
4.71 Tw
(was half of what Creative Computing's damages expert) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
.75 Tw
(charged Creative Computing. The other expert, the award for) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
.12 Tw
(whose expenses Getloaded does not challenge, was brought in) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
2.27 Tw
(solely to deal with the harm caused by Getloaded's lies in) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
.37 Tw
(depositions and destruction of evidence. But the district judge) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
1.74 Tw
(explained that ) Tj
(about one-half of) Tj
( the work of both experts) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
1.17 Tw
(was focused on the ) Tj
(bad faith) Tj
( conduct of Getloaded, so the) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
.5 Tw
(judge awarded half the total of both. Getloaded is correct that) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
-1.06 Tw
(such a sanction is limited to actual costs related to the ) Tj
(contuma-) Tj
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -14.3 Td
2.14 Tw
(cy.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(23) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The district judge made a reasonable finding on pre-) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(cisely that point, which is not clearly erroneous. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -28.4 Td
(IV.) Tj
9 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Costs) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
12 -28.4 Td
.9 Tw
(Getloaded argues that because Creative Computing lost on) Tj
-12 -14.3 Td
.28 Tw
(its copyright and Lanham Act claims, the district court should) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
.92 Tw
(have required allocation of attorneys' fees and costs between) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
1.66 Tw
(losing and winning claims and awarded only those amounts) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
1.32 Tw
(attributable to the claims on which Creative Computing pre-) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
1 Tw
(vailed. The district judge carefully inquired as to this matter,) Tj
0 -14.3 Td
1.8 Tw
(and concluded that the claims in this case were not distinct) Tj
0 -14.2 Td
2.04 Tw
(enough to separate them for purposes of fees or costs. The) Tj
0 -14.2 Td
.75 Tw
(evidence overlapped, and on the central issue, that Getloaded) Tj
0 -14.2 Td
3.21 Tw
(made unauthorized intrusions that caused substantial dam-) Tj
0 -14.2 Td
1.07 Tw
(ages, it was the same. Allocation is not required where there) Tj
0 -14.2 Td
2.41 Tw
(is a ) Tj
(common core of facts) Tj
( that requires substantially the) Tj
0 -14.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(same expense on prevailing and unsuccessful claims.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(24) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
1.2 Tw
( ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -28 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.04 Tw
(23) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(United States v. Nat'l Med. Enter., Inc.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 792 F.2d 906, 910 \(9th Cir.) Tj
-10 -12.1 Td
1 Tw
(1986\). ) Tj
10 -15.1 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(24) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
1 Tw
(Cf. ) Tj
(Hensley v. Eckerhart) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 461 U.S. 424, 435 \(1983\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -434.75 m 300 -434.75 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14577) Tj
-212.0226 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
3727
endobj
43 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 44 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 13 13
47 0 obj
<<
/Length 48 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.2 Tw
0 Tc
(V.) Tj
9 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(The Injunction) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -26 Td
4.33 Tw
([3]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Getloaded argues that the terms of the permanent) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
2.83 Tw
(injunction the district court granted are overbroad and not) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
0 Tw
(specific in terms) Tj
( as required by Federal Rule of Civil Proce-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.81 Tw
(dure 65\(d\). The terms to which it objects are prohibitions) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.38 Tw
(against Getloaded copying or storing truckstop.com's source) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
5.37 Tw
(code, using information related to or based on trucks-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
4 Tw
(top.com's source code, using Creative Computing's trade) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.53 Tw
(secrets such as by selling its customer lists or contacting its) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.11 Tw
(customers, or assisting anyone else in doing any of these) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.84 Tw
(things. In the context of this case, the district court did not) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.07 Tw
(abuse its discretion in determining that the prohibitions were) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.37 Tw
(sufficiently clear, and the reasons for them were sufficiently) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.38 Tw
(established.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(25) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Getloaded's belligerent violation of the tempo-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.14 Tw
(rary restraining order and preliminary injunction during the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.16 Tw
(litigation, and its executives' lies in their depositions, justified) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
(an especially aggressive prophylactic injunction. Marketing to) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.94 Tw
(Creative Computing's customers is restricted by the injunc-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.46 Tw
(tion's terms to marketing based in any way on exploitation of) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.83 Tw
(Creative Computing's trade secrets, which Getloaded had) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
6.61 Tw
(done in the past by subverting Creative Computing's) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(employee. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -26.1 Td
2.14 Tw
([4]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Getloaded objects to being prohibited from accessing) Tj
-12 -13.2 Td
1.5 Tw
(truckstop.com. It is out of the ordinary, except in child por-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.3 Tw
(nography cases, to prohibit a person or company from access-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.14 Tw
(ing what is otherwise a publicly-available website. Ordinarily,) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1 Tw
(when a company chooses to make certain information public) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.63 Tw
(via its website, it does so knowing that its competitors may) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.58 Tw
(view and may take advantage of any information it chooses) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.11 Tw
(to publicize. The prohibition imposed in this case barring) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.81 Tw
(Getloaded from accessing any portion, public or not, of the) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.56 Tw
(truckstop.com website is especially far-reaching, because) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.81 Tw
(the prohibition is not limited to a particular period of time or) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.83 Tw
(25) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
(Pac. Mar. Ass'n v. Int'l Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(Union) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 517 F.2d 1158, 1163 \(9th Cir. 1975\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -466.55 m 300 -466.55 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14578) Tj
60.4774 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
48 0 obj
3897
endobj
46 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 49 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 47 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 14 14
51 0 obj
<<
/Length 52 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.53 Tw
0 Tc
(to just the non-public, password-protected areas of the web-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.54 Tw
(site. Under the particular facts of this case, the past egregious) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.24 Tw
(conduct of Getloaded, its owners and employees, nevertheless) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.8 Tw
(justified the extraordinarily broad prohibition imposed by the) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.23 Tw
(district court. Getloaded is in a position analogous to one who) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.66 Tw
(has repeatedly shoplifted from a particular store, so the judge) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(prohibits him from entering it again, saving the store's secur-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.86 Tw
(ity guards from the burden of having to follow him around) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.41 Tw
(whenever he is there. One of Getloaded's owners also owns) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.73 Tw
(another company that is a client of truckstop.com, so in view) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.1 Tw
(of Getloaded's past abuse, the district court was within its dis-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.06 Tw
(cretion in giving extended reach to its injunction to assure that) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.22 Tw
(that owner, or others like him, would not be a channel for fur-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(ther abuse. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -26.2 Td
(AFFIRMED.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(14579) Tj
-212.0226 0 Td
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(REATIVE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMPUTING) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. G) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ETLOADED) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(.) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(COM) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
52 0 obj
1817
endobj
50 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 49 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 51 0 R
>>
endobj
1 0 obj
[ /PDF /Text ]
endobj
53 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 219 /Zcaron 135 /ccedilla 152 /ydieresis 243 /atilde 140 /icircumflex
31 /threesuperior 136 /ecircumflex 146 /thorn 138 /egrave 30 /twosuperior 130 /eacute
254 /otilde 155 /Aacute 147 /ocircumflex 217 /yacute 129 /udieresis 247 /threequarters
131 /acircumflex 190 /Eth 137 /edieresis 151 /ugrave 223 /trademark 149 /ograve 215 /scaron
228 /Idieresis 218 /uacute 133 /agrave 210 /ntilde 134 /aring 220 /zcaron 226 /Icircumflex
209 /Ntilde 150 /ucircumflex 159 /Ecircumflex 224 /Iacute 128 /Ccedilla 153 /Odieresis
214 /Scaron 176 /Edieresis 229 /Igrave 132 /adieresis 236 /Ograve 181 /Egrave 242 /Ydieresis
221 /registered 237 /Otilde 244 /onequarter 240 /Ugrave 239 /Ucircumflex 145 /Thorn
25 /divide 158 /Atilde 238 /Uacute 231 /Ocircumflex 29 /logicalnot 143 /Aring 139 /idieresis
252 /iacute 160 /aacute 27 /plusminus 26 /multiply 154 /Udieresis 28 /minus 204 /onesuperior
144 /Eacute 156 /Acircumflex 222 /copyright 157 /Agrave 148 /odieresis 253 /oacute 127 /degree
141 /igrave 201 /mu 230 /Oacute 192 /eth 142 /Adieresis 216 /Yacute 255 /brokenbar 246 /onehalf
]
>>
endobj
54 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Times-Bold
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -168 -218 1000 935 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 139.00
/StemH 69.50
/ItalicAngle 0.00
/CapHeight 676
/XHeight 461
/Ascent 676
/Descent -205
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F1
/BaseFont /Times-Bold
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 570 570 570 570 570 300 300
250 333 555 500 500 1000 833 333 333 333 500 570 250 333 250 278
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 333 333 570 570 570 500
930 722 667 722 722 667 611 778 778 389 500 778 667 944 722 778
611 778 722 556 667 722 722 1000 722 722 667 333 278 333 581 500
333 500 556 444 556 444 333 500 556 278 333 556 278 833 556 500
556 556 444 389 333 556 500 722 500 500 444 394 220 394 520 400
722 556 444 500 500 500 500 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 722 722
667 611 556 500 500 500 556 556 500 778 722 722 722 722 722 667
500 333 500 500 167 500 500 500 500 278 500 500 333 333 556 556
667 500 500 500 250 667 540 350 333 500 500 500 1000 1000 722 500
500 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 556 333 333 300 333 333 333
1000 722 556 250 250 250 556 389 722 500 556 667 444 747 747 1000
389 1000 389 300 389 389 778 778 667 778 1000 330 778 778 722 722
722 722 722 500 750 278 750 750 278 500 722 556 278 500 500 220 ]
/Encoding 53 0 R
/FontDescriptor 54 0 R
>>
endobj
55 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 219 /Zcaron 135 /ccedilla 152 /ydieresis 243 /atilde 140 /icircumflex
31 /threesuperior 136 /ecircumflex 146 /thorn 138 /egrave 30 /twosuperior 130 /eacute
254 /otilde 155 /Aacute 147 /ocircumflex 217 /yacute 129 /udieresis 247 /threequarters
131 /acircumflex 190 /Eth 137 /edieresis 151 /ugrave 223 /trademark 149 /ograve 215 /scaron
228 /Idieresis 218 /uacute 133 /agrave 210 /ntilde 134 /aring 220 /zcaron 226 /Icircumflex
209 /Ntilde 150 /ucircumflex 159 /Ecircumflex 224 /Iacute 128 /Ccedilla 153 /Odieresis
214 /Scaron 176 /Edieresis 229 /Igrave 132 /adieresis 236 /Ograve 181 /Egrave 242 /Ydieresis
221 /registered 237 /Otilde 244 /onequarter 240 /Ugrave 239 /Ucircumflex 145 /Thorn
25 /divide 158 /Atilde 238 /Uacute 231 /Ocircumflex 29 /logicalnot 143 /Aring 139 /idieresis
252 /iacute 160 /aacute 27 /plusminus 26 /multiply 154 /Udieresis 28 /minus 204 /onesuperior
144 /Eacute 156 /Acircumflex 222 /copyright 157 /Agrave 148 /odieresis 253 /oacute 127 /degree
141 /igrave 201 /mu 230 /Oacute 192 /eth 142 /Adieresis 216 /Yacute 255 /brokenbar 246 /onehalf
]
>>
endobj
56 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Times-Roman
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -168 -218 1000 898 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 84.00
/StemH 42.00
/ItalicAngle 0.00
/CapHeight 662
/XHeight 450
/Ascent 683
/Descent -217
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F2
/BaseFont /Times-Roman
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 564 564 564 564 564 300 300
250 333 408 500 500 833 778 333 333 333 500 564 250 333 250 278
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 564 564 564 444
921 722 667 667 722 611 556 722 722 333 389 722 611 889 722 722
556 722 667 556 611 722 722 944 722 722 611 333 278 333 469 500
333 444 500 444 500 444 333 500 500 278 278 500 278 778 500 500
500 500 333 389 278 500 500 722 500 500 444 480 200 480 541 400
667 500 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 722 722
611 556 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 722 722 722 722 722 722 611
444 333 500 500 167 500 500 500 500 180 444 500 333 333 556 556
611 500 500 500 250 611 453 350 333 444 444 500 1000 1000 722 444
500 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 500 333 333 300 333 333 333
1000 722 500 250 250 250 556 389 722 500 500 611 444 760 760 980
333 889 333 276 333 333 722 722 611 722 889 310 722 722 722 722
722 667 722 444 750 278 750 750 278 500 722 500 278 500 500 200 ]
/Encoding 55 0 R
/FontDescriptor 56 0 R
>>
endobj
57 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 240 /apple ]
>>
endobj
58 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Symbol
/Flags 4
/FontBBox [ -180 -293 1090 1010 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 85.00
/StemH 42.50
/ItalicAngle 0.00
/CapHeight 0
/XHeight 0
/Ascent 0
/Descent 0
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F3
/BaseFont /Symbol
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 333 713 500 549 833 778 439 333 333 500 549 250 549 250 278
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 549 549 549 444
549 722 667 722 612 611 763 603 722 333 631 722 686 889 722 722
768 741 556 592 611 690 439 768 645 795 611 333 863 333 658 500
500 631 549 549 494 439 521 411 603 329 603 549 549 576 521 549
549 521 549 603 439 576 713 686 493 686 494 480 200 480 549 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 620 247 549 167 713 500 753 753 753 753 1042 987 603 987 603
400 549 411 549 549 713 494 460 549 549 549 549 1000 603 1000 658
823 686 795 987 768 768 823 768 768 713 713 713 713 713 713 713
768 713 790 250 250 250 549 250 713 603 603 1042 987 603 987 603
494 329 790 790 786 713 384 384 384 384 384 384 494 494 494 494
790 329 274 686 686 686 384 384 384 384 384 384 494 494 494 250 ]
/Encoding 57 0 R
/FontDescriptor 58 0 R
>>
endobj
59 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 219 /Zcaron 135 /ccedilla 152 /ydieresis 243 /atilde 140 /icircumflex
31 /threesuperior 136 /ecircumflex 146 /thorn 138 /egrave 30 /twosuperior 130 /eacute
254 /otilde 155 /Aacute 147 /ocircumflex 217 /yacute 129 /udieresis 247 /threequarters
131 /acircumflex 190 /Eth 137 /edieresis 151 /ugrave 223 /trademark 149 /ograve 215 /scaron
228 /Idieresis 218 /uacute 133 /agrave 210 /ntilde 134 /aring 220 /zcaron 226 /Icircumflex
209 /Ntilde 150 /ucircumflex 159 /Ecircumflex 224 /Iacute 128 /Ccedilla 153 /Odieresis
214 /Scaron 176 /Edieresis 229 /Igrave 132 /adieresis 236 /Ograve 181 /Egrave 242 /Ydieresis
221 /registered 237 /Otilde 244 /onequarter 240 /Ugrave 239 /Ucircumflex 145 /Thorn
25 /divide 158 /Atilde 238 /Uacute 231 /Ocircumflex 29 /logicalnot 143 /Aring 139 /idieresis
252 /iacute 160 /aacute 27 /plusminus 26 /multiply 154 /Udieresis 28 /minus 204 /onesuperior
144 /Eacute 156 /Acircumflex 222 /copyright 157 /Agrave 148 /odieresis 253 /oacute 127 /degree
141 /igrave 201 /mu 230 /Oacute 192 /eth 142 /Adieresis 216 /Yacute 255 /brokenbar 246 /onehalf
]
>>
endobj
60 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Times-Italic
/Flags 98
/FontBBox [ -169 -217 1010 883 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 76.00
/StemH 38.00
/ItalicAngle -15.50
/CapHeight 653
/XHeight 441
/Ascent 683
/Descent -205
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F4
/BaseFont /Times-Italic
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 675 675 675 675 675 300 300
250 333 420 500 500 833 778 333 333 333 500 675 250 333 250 278
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 333 333 675 675 675 500
920 611 611 667 722 611 611 722 722 333 444 667 556 833 667 722
611 722 611 500 556 722 611 833 611 556 556 389 278 389 422 500
333 500 500 444 500 444 278 500 500 278 278 444 278 722 500 500
500 500 389 389 278 500 444 667 444 444 389 400 275 400 541 400
667 500 444 500 500 500 500 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 611 611
611 611 500 500 500 500 500 500 444 722 722 611 611 611 611 611
500 389 500 500 167 500 500 500 500 214 556 500 333 333 500 500
611 500 500 500 250 611 523 350 333 556 556 500 889 1000 722 500
500 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 500 333 333 300 333 333 333
889 667 500 250 250 250 500 389 556 444 500 556 389 760 760 980
333 889 333 276 333 333 722 722 556 722 944 310 722 722 722 722
722 667 556 500 750 278 750 750 278 500 667 500 278 500 500 275 ]
/Encoding 59 0 R
/FontDescriptor 60 0 R
>>
endobj
61 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 219 /Zcaron 135 /ccedilla 152 /ydieresis 243 /atilde 140 /icircumflex
31 /threesuperior 136 /ecircumflex 146 /thorn 138 /egrave 30 /twosuperior 130 /eacute
254 /otilde 155 /Aacute 147 /ocircumflex 217 /yacute 129 /udieresis 247 /threequarters
131 /acircumflex 190 /Eth 137 /edieresis 151 /ugrave 223 /trademark 149 /ograve 215 /scaron
228 /Idieresis 218 /uacute 133 /agrave 210 /ntilde 134 /aring 220 /zcaron 226 /Icircumflex
209 /Ntilde 150 /ucircumflex 159 /Ecircumflex 224 /Iacute 128 /Ccedilla 153 /Odieresis
214 /Scaron 176 /Edieresis 229 /Igrave 132 /adieresis 236 /Ograve 181 /Egrave 242 /Ydieresis
221 /registered 237 /Otilde 244 /onequarter 240 /Ugrave 239 /Ucircumflex 145 /Thorn
25 /divide 158 /Atilde 238 /Uacute 231 /Ocircumflex 29 /logicalnot 143 /Aring 139 /idieresis
252 /iacute 160 /aacute 27 /plusminus 26 /multiply 154 /Udieresis 28 /minus 204 /onesuperior
144 /Eacute 156 /Acircumflex 222 /copyright 157 /Agrave 148 /odieresis 253 /oacute 127 /degree
141 /igrave 201 /mu 230 /Oacute 192 /eth 142 /Adieresis 216 /Yacute 255 /brokenbar 246 /onehalf
]
>>
endobj
62 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Helvetica-Bold
/Flags 32
/FontBBox [ -170 -228 1003 962 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 140.00
/StemH 70.00
/ItalicAngle 0.00
/CapHeight 718
/XHeight 532
/Ascent 718
/Descent -207
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F5
/BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278
278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 584 584 584 584 584 333 333
278 333 474 556 556 889 722 278 333 333 389 584 278 333 278 278
556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 333 333 584 584 584 611
975 722 722 722 722 667 611 778 722 278 556 722 611 833 722 778
667 778 722 667 611 722 667 944 667 667 611 333 278 333 584 556
278 556 611 556 611 556 333 611 611 278 278 556 278 889 611 611
611 611 389 556 333 611 556 778 556 556 500 389 280 389 584 400
722 611 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 278 722 722
667 667 611 611 611 611 611 611 556 778 722 722 722 722 722 667
556 333 556 556 167 556 556 556 556 238 500 556 333 333 611 611
667 556 556 556 278 667 556 350 278 500 500 556 1000 1000 722 611
611 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 611 333 333 333 333 333 333
1000 722 611 278 278 278 667 556 667 556 611 611 500 737 737 1000
278 1000 278 370 278 278 778 778 611 778 1000 365 778 778 722 722
722 889 667 556 834 278 834 834 278 611 944 611 278 611 611 280 ]
/Encoding 61 0 R
/FontDescriptor 62 0 R
>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/Kids [3 0 R 11 0 R 14 0 R 18 0 R 21 0 R 24 0 R]
/Count 6
/Type /Pages
/Parent 63 0 R
>>
endobj
30 0 obj
<<
/Kids [27 0 R 31 0 R 34 0 R 37 0 R 40 0 R 43 0 R]
/Count 6
/Type /Pages
/Parent 63 0 R
>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<<
/Kids [46 0 R 50 0 R]
/Count 2
/Type /Pages
/Parent 63 0 R
>>
endobj
63 0 obj
<<
/Kids [10 0 R 30 0 R 49 0 R]
/Count 14
/Type /Pages
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Pages 63 0 R
>>
endobj
64 0 obj
<<
/CreationDate (Wednesday October 13, 2004 14:57:54)
/Creator (VERSACOMP R05.2)
/Producer (ECMP5)
>>
endobj
xref
0 65
0000000000 65535 f
0000053878 00000 n
0000066498 00000 n
0000002757 00000 n
0000000044 00000 n
0000002734 00000 n
0000055343 00000 n
0000057995 00000 n
0000059549 00000 n
0000062196 00000 n
0000066070 00000 n
0000003908 00000 n
0000002971 00000 n
0000003885 00000 n
0000007441 00000 n
0000004102 00000 n
0000007417 00000 n
0000064847 00000 n
0000011156 00000 n
0000007647 00000 n
0000011132 00000 n
0000015231 00000 n
0000011350 00000 n
0000015207 00000 n
0000019438 00000 n
0000015448 00000 n
0000019414 00000 n
0000025304 00000 n
0000019655 00000 n
0000025280 00000 n
0000066186 00000 n
0000030027 00000 n
0000025521 00000 n
0000030003 00000 n
0000034372 00000 n
0000030244 00000 n
0000034348 00000 n
0000039265 00000 n
0000034591 00000 n
0000039241 00000 n
0000043356 00000 n
0000039484 00000 n
0000043332 00000 n
0000047387 00000 n
0000043575 00000 n
0000047363 00000 n
0000051588 00000 n
0000047606 00000 n
0000051564 00000 n
0000066303 00000 n
0000053709 00000 n
0000051807 00000 n
0000053685 00000 n
0000053911 00000 n
0000055063 00000 n
0000056563 00000 n
0000057715 00000 n
0000059211 00000 n
0000059283 00000 n
0000060761 00000 n
0000061913 00000 n
0000063411 00000 n
0000064563 00000 n
0000066392 00000 n
0000066554 00000 n
trailer
<<
/Size 65
/Root 2 0 R
/Info 64 0 R
>>
startxref
66691
%%EOF
2 0 obj<>
endobj
64 0 obj<>
endobj
65 0 obj<>
endobj
66 0 obj<>stream
Wednesday October 13, 2004 14:57:54
ECMP5
VERSACOMP R05.2
2008-01-13T15:42:36-05:00
2008-01-13T15:42:36-05:00
2008-01-13T15:42:36-05:00
application/pdf
Creative Computing d/b/a Internet Truckstop.com v. Getloaded.com LLC, et al. (9th Cir.)
uuid:13caa92f-110a-4a85-a0da-054ad0950eb4
uuid:40f7bb78-e7d6-498b-a4db-d8cb54c2b363
endstream
endobj
xref
2 1
0000068082 00000 n
64 3
0000068143 00000 n
0000068351 00000 n
0000068648 00000 n
trailer
<]/Prev 66691 >>
startxref
72412
%%EOF